Content
Crypto assets have varied uses and, depending on the type of digital asset and its arrangement, the approach to regulation can be different (Hennelly, 2022) . This paper analyzed several academic articles and industry related papers on the topic of regulation. Additionally, some articles that studied the historical role and evolution of the crypto market were also analyzed to make it easier to navigate the current issues facing crypto assets and their regulatory framework. On the other hand, participants from the crypto industry argued11 that the crypto assets should not be regulated or would be difficult to regulate. The difficulty in regulating a decentralized entity is one of the reasons, while the concern over the potential to freeze innovation, or the risk of excessive regulation, or even the introduction of intricate and complex new rules are other reasons raised by the industry. The “economic version of public interest theory” argues that https://www.xcritical.com/ regulation is a solution to a market failure (Morgan & Yeung, 2007) , and in the case of the crypto market, could be a response to the information asymmetry.
Global rules and regulations for cryptocurrency
- The application of traditional rules to crypto assets is still subject to a case-by-case analysis.
- Money services businesses are defined by FinCEN to include any person doing business as a money transmitter, and a money transmitter is any person that accepts “currency, funds, or other value that substitutes for currency” from one person and gives it to another person.
- If your address is ever linked to your identity, every transaction will be linked to you.
- In 2022, blockchain firm Valereum announced plans to set up a cryptocurrency stock exchange in the territory, and bought a 90% stake in the Gibraltar Stock Exchange.
- This proposed bill encompasses key provisions such as bans on private cryptocurrencies, the establishment of a regulatory authority, the introduction of an official digital currency, and the promotion of blockchain technology.
The Department of Financial Protection and Innovation has provided numerous no-action letters to digital currency businesses. These letters often exempt digital currency ATMs from licensing and have included peer-to-peer transfer businesses. In 2020, a new Consumer Financial Protection Divison was created under the California Department of Financial Protection. Part of this new division’s mandate is to research new financial products including cryptocurrency. As how to accept crypto payments on website a distributed ledger technology (DLT) application, cryptocurrency has impacted the current financial legal relationship, and its regulation is becoming increasingly important.
Cryptocurrency Laws and Regulations by State
For this study I selected the main legislation and rules from each of the Countries subject of this analysis. The list of rules is far from exhaustive, and they are just an example of how crypto assets are being perceived in such countries. This article providesa comparative analysis of financial regulations across different jurisdictions,including the United States the UK and the European Union that could be appliedto crypto market. It discusses the economic, social, and technological factorsdriving the need for crypto regulation and explores the challenges andopportunities these regulations present for financial stability, consumerprotection, and innovation. By examining the different regulatory approaches,the article offers insights into the development of a balanced regulatoryframework that addresses the unique aspects of digital currencies, maintainingthe innovative approach of the crypto market while safeguarding against risks.
B. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Approach to Cryptocurrency Regulation.
Exactly how digital assets integrate with existing financial systems can also be directed by lawmakers or government agencies. China can refer to the UK’s regulatory sandbox system to supervise blockchain financial companies, help these companies form a clearer corporate development strategy, reduce the adverse impact of regulatory uncertainty on companies, and provide better financing channels for the innovative development of the blockchain field. China’s third-party payment, represented by Alipay and WeChat Pay, has grown into a global benchmark for inclusive finance under a relatively loose regulatory environment. As of the end of 2018, the proportion of adults using electronic payments was 82.39 % (PBC 2019), which is far ahead in the world. The outstanding practice of China’s digital economy and electronic payment provides a good reference for China’s next digital currency supervision.
Fintech: Financial Technology Research Guide
According to a research report released by the blockchain security company CipherTrace, by the end of July 2021, major crypto thefts, hacks, and frauds totaled $681 million (CipherTrace 2021). It is precisely because of the existence of these problems that supervision has become the inevitable choice of governments. On 19 December 2017, Yapian, the owner of South Korean exchange Youbit, filed for bankruptcy after suffering two hacks that year.[186][187] Customers were still granted access to 75% of their assets. Some commentators have suggested that section § 546(g) allows debtors and their counterparties to conduct pre-bankruptcy planning that maximize both a creditor’s claims and the debtor’s goals without having to worry about the transfers being reversed if determined to be constructively fraudulent. Another benefit for the non-debtor counterparty of currency classification and the swap safe harbor is exemption from the automatic stay. If the transaction is characterized as a swap, a creditor will have the ability to initiate, or continue to litigation against a company to enforce its swap agreements without regard to the automatic stay.
In addition to the aforementioned international organizations, many countries have begun to regulate emerging cryptocurrencies through their domestic administrative, legislative, and judicial systems (Alvarez 2018). At present, China’s legal positioning of cryptocurrency is ambiguous, which has confused inconsistent law applications in judicial trials. More recently, the SEC has brought actions to enforce the mandate set down in what is now called the “Munchee Order”, using the same framework. The SEC successfully brought a preliminary injunction against a technology corporation which attempted to undertake an ICO without a proper registration under the Securities Act. In S.E.C. v. Telegram, the company tried to use a two-step process to avoid making a public offering of its coins by first selling the coins to initial purchasers who would then act as a go between and resell these coins to the general public on a secondary market.
Crypto firms must notify the OFSI as soon as possible if they know or have reasonable suspicion that a person is subject to sanctions or has committed a financial sanctions offense. Furthermore, China banned Bitcoin mining in May 2021, forcing many engaging in the activity to close operations entirely or relocate to jurisdictions with a more favorable regulatory environment. The continuous fight between regulators, broker-dealers, investors, and the crypto industry shows that the U.S. is still evolving, regardless of the frameworks introduced and the powers given to regulators. The U.S. announced a new framework in 2022 that opened the door to further regulation. The new directive handed power to existing market regulators such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). In the absence of obvious partisan signals, monitoring the details of competing proposals is especially important.
Section 2 analyses the Theories of Regulation that would explain the reason for regulating this market. Section 3 will consider if the existing rules are efficient to address the Governments’ concerns, or if other rules will still need to be created. Section 4 addresses the global perspective for crypto regulation from Supra-national bodies. These sections provide a comprehensive examination of how diverse regulatory approaches impact the global economy, financial stability, and innovation within the crypto market.
The legislation will likely include new security protocols and new obligations for crypto service providers to report suspicious activity. The country has been working on several aspects when it comes to regulation, including taxation. In September 2022, the government announced it would introduce remittance rules as early as May 2023 to prevent criminals from using cryptocurrency exchanges to launder money. The Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds has been revised to allow for the collection of customer information.
It’s not that national authorities or international regulatory bodies have been inactive—in fact, a lot has been done. Some countries (such as Japan and Switzerland) have amended or introduced new legislation covering crypto assets and their service providers, while others (including the European Union, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, and United States) are at the drafting stage. But national authorities have, on the whole, taken very different approaches to regulatory policy for crypto assets. To complicate matters, the terminology used to describe the many different activities, products, and stakeholders is not globally harmonized. The term “crypto asset” itself refers to a wide spectrum of digital products that are privately issued using similar technology (cryptography and often distributed ledgers) and that can be stored and traded using primarily digital wallets and exchanges.
If the annual income or personal net worth of the investors does not exceed US$100,000, the highest fundraising amount in a year is US$2000, or 5 % of the net income (Stemler 2013). This small crowdfunding model makes small and medium investors have limited losses even if they make investment mistakes, which is a good reference for cryptocurrency investors. If small investors invest in cryptocurrencies, they can learn from the JOBS Act for investor suitability management, thereby better-protecting investors.
Decentralized finance applications let you loan your crypto with interest; you can stake a compatible one on a blockchain or at certain exchanges for rewards, or you can hold on to it and hope its market value increases. None of these methods are guaranteed to make money, but many people have benefitted from them. As of June 2024, El Salvador is the only country to accept Bitcoin as legal tender for monetary transactions. Enthusiasts called it a victory for crypto; however, crypto exchanges are regulated by the SEC, as are coin offerings or sales to institutional investors.
The Howley test and the flexible nature of the approach to determining what a security is has allowed the SEC to regulate cryptocurrency in the securities market. The SEC brought its first enforcement action against an individual alleged to have acted as an unregistered broker-dealer in an ICO sale and the facilitation of secondary market trading in cryptocurrency tokens. The SEC relied on the findings of the DAO Report findings to reason that the Respondents in TokenLot had violated the Exchange Act.
In addition to this infrastructure add-on, the BCBS has defined a capital requirement for certain crypto assets. This means that banks will have to reserve enough capital to protect any loss arising from certain cryptoassets. As can be extract from the Executive Order, if the United States decides to establish new rules for crypto assets, the crypto market may face a comprehensive new regulation.
The proposed framework would enable consumers to safely purchase and sell crypto assets in a regulated environment, and represents a move to position Australia at the forefront of the global effort to keep tech companies in check. With sophisticated tracing tools available, financial watchdogs and law enforcement agencies have demonstrated their ability to identify and expose money laundering activities involving Bitcoin. Since every Bitcoin transaction is recorded on the blockchain, authorities can leverage this information to uncover illicit schemes. Notably, there have been instances where attempts to execute a $5 billion cryptocurrency heist were thwarted.
After leaving the EU in 2020, the UK transposed the cryptocurrency regulation requirements set out in 5AMLD and 6AMLD into domestic law. Accordingly, cryptocurrency exchanges in the UK need to register with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and comply with AML/CFT reporting obligations. While it doesn’t make special provisions for exchanges, FCA guidance stresses that entities engaging in activities involving cryptoassets must comply with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (MLRs). Amendments to those regulations came into force in January 2020 and incorporate the latest FATF guidelines. In 2021, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) published guidance for crypto issuers that own or hold crypto assets.
HB 1724 “Establish[es] a task force on digital currency and the impact on widespread use of cryptocurrency and other forms of digital currencies in this Commonwealth.” HB 2512 includes virtual currency in the definition of a cash transaction for real property transactions. SB 399 and SB 401 relate to ethics standards and financial disclosure requirements for public officers and include virtual currency in the definition of a cash gift. Delaware has no cryptocurrency-specific laws, but cryptocurrency may be encompassed in existing money transmission statutes. 5 DE Code § 2303 states that “No person…shall…engage in the business of receiving money for transmission or transmitting the same without having first obtained a license hereunder.” However, money transmission is not defined in Delaware law. Major cryptocurrency exchanges Coinbase, Binance, and Gemini have all registered as money transmitters in Delaware. The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) banned financial institutions from handling Bitcoin transactions in 2013 and went further by banning ICOs and domestic cryptocurrency exchanges in 2017.
This is a particular fear that authoritarian governments that might view CBDCs as an opportunity to conduct surveillance on their population, though many central banks, including the U.S. Federal Reserve, have committed to intermediated CBDC models that would protect users’ privacy through a combination of strong encryption and intermediaries who would shield data from being accessed directly by the government. But the exact mechanisms by which that data would be protected—as well as who would have access to it under what circumstances—remain hazy since many countries have not yet decided on the implementation of their CBDCs. If the policing efforts and exchange sanctions represent the United States’ attempts to go after the downsides of cryptocurrencies through more aggressive policy measures, the push for CBDC pilot projects seems geared towards trying to preserve some of the potential benefits that virtual currencies were supposed to provide. Many of those benefits, particularly financial inclusion and easier access to currency for unbanked people, have proved largely elusive. The people who seem to have gained the most from cryptocurrencies were not unbanked but rather entrepreneurs with easy access to capital and the ability to treat cryptocurrencies as investments rather than use them as a means of covering needed expenses.
